🔗 Share this article

No fewer than eleven jurisdictions and a pair of regions have complied with a recent demand from the federal government to remove references of transgender issues and the presence of transgender and non-binary individuals from a federal sexual health program, authorities confirmed.

The government established a recent cutoff for stripping these references, threatening the withdrawal of substantial government funding. Nearly all of the agreeing jurisdictions have Republican-controlled lawmaking bodies and predominantly GOP governors.

Legal Challenges and Financial Conflicts

An additional sixteen jurisdictions and the nation's capital have filed a lawsuit challenging the administration's demand, arguing it violates legislative power, which created the $75 million sex education program, known as the Personal Responsibility Education Program (Prep).

All states participating in the lawsuit are led by Democratic governors.

In a late Monday judicial ruling, a federal judge blocked the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which oversees the program, from withholding financial support to the Democratic states if they refuse to comply.

“The agency does not demonstrate that the updated requirements are reasonable, nor does it offer any reasonable explanation, other than pretext, for its decisions,” wrote the judge, a U.S. district judge in the state. “HHS provides no evidence that it made informed determinations or considered the statutory objectives.”

Initiative Aims and Government Scrutiny

The program seeks to inform adolescents on healthy relationships and how to avoid unplanned parenthood and the spread of sexually transmitted infections.

In April, the federal government demanded all states and territories obtaining Prep funds to provide a version of their educational materials to HHS and its subsidiary, the ACF office, for a “medical accuracy review”.

By late summer, the government dispatched notices to numerous jurisdictions, informing them that, during the review, it had discovered “material in the educational programs that deviate from the scope of the program's legal framework.”

In particular, the administration claimed it had identified evidence of “gender ideology,” a term often used by rightwing factions to describe the notion that gender is a changeable social construct and that trans and non-binary people are real.

Notable Cases of Requested Changes

The government instructed one state to drop a lesson that said: “Adolescents may identify in ways that differ from their biological sex.”

It instructed another state to eliminate a line from a educational module that stated: “Individuals regardless of identity need to know how to prevent unplanned pregnancy and infections.”

Additionally, health instructors in many jurisdictions could no longer be told to “demonstrate acceptance and respect for all students, regardless of individual traits, including ethnicity, heritage, religion, social class, orientation or gender identity,” based on the letters sent to states.

Official Statements and Jurisdictional Reactions

“Accountability is coming,” declared Andrew Gradison, acting assistant secretary of the ACF office, in a announcement. “Government money will not be used to poison the minds of the youth or advance dangerous ideological agendas.”

Several states and territories stated they would remove the content or had completed the process. These consist of Alaska, Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, West Virginia and Wyoming, as well as the U.S. Virgin Islands and the Northern Mariana Islands.

Another pair of jurisdictions, Alabama and South Dakota, reported their educational programs never included the language referenced in the administration’s letters.

Effects on Adolescents and Psychological Well-being

Collectively, these jurisdictions are inhabited by more than 120,000 transgender individuals between the ages of 13 and 17, according to projections from a university department.

“If our goal is to help adolescents and give them a secure environment, I’m not sure why we are stomping on the at-risk teenagers in the community,” said an advocate, who leads Rise that offers health instruction in one state.

“When the government says that there’s something wrong with you and the educators aren’t allowed to provide information or they have to disclose your identity to family – when you know that that’s not secure – that’s horrible for mental health.”

Nearly half of trans and non-binary youth seriously considered suicide in the past year, based on a 2024 survey from a mental health organization. School support for these adolescents is associated with lower rates of attempted suicide, the group discovered.

Earlier Incidents and Continuing Conflicts

Previously, the Trump administration instructed a state to remove references to transgender topics from its educational program.

When the jurisdiction refused, the government revoked its funding, eliminating about $12 million in federal funding and stopping sex education programs in schools, juvenile detention facilities and group homes for foster children.

The state agency is challenging the termination. So far, it has been unable to make up for the lost funding.

The government has also told educators who receive funding from two other federal sex education initiatives, the $50 million SRAE program and the $101 million TPPP initiative, that they cannot teach about “gender ideology.”

An early October judicial ruling prevented the government from changing TPPP, while the latest ruling stops it from modifying SRAE in the suing jurisdictions that challenged Prep.

The ACF office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.